Ineffective | Basic | Proficient | Distinguished | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. The board ensures it is ready to govern. | The board: Is self-serving or serves special interests Takes no responsibility for the organization Never considers its purpose as a board Lacks a clear approach to governing Doesn’t believe all people can learn at high levels; Uses poverty an excuse Has no system by which it operates Has no rationale or overall plan for what it does in board meetings | The board: Claims responsibility for the organization, but tends to let the CEO carry the burden Rarely discusses the board’s purpose apart from that of the CEO Adopts a primarily management role Puts full authority in the CEO's hands Does not know organizational results efforts in detail, leaving it to the staff Maintains a system of management, yet has no discernible system for governing | The board: Considers itself ultimately responsible for organizational performance, and to serve others Views its role as different from that of the CEO Believes all people can learn at high levels Has adopted guidance for its own processes Takes a strategic approach to board work Expects staff to align with board’s governance role Establishes an approach to governing that forges strategic and operational guidance and accountability into one coherent system | The board, in addition to proficient indicators: +Dedicates itself to a servant-leader role +Adopts a growth mindset that values effort to overcome obstacles to learning +Believes in the potential of all people, staff, and board members to grow +Focuses meetings on strategic work vs. reviewing/approving staff activity +Documents its systematic governing approach +Actively pursues professional development to maintain and enhance its governing approach |
2. The board exercises strategic voice on behalf of the community. | The board: Fails to connect with the community Acts/reacts in inconsistent, ad hoc ways Operates without evidence of a plan Does not seem to know what the community thinks is important Doesn’t understand student learning Fails to speak out for community values Sets policy ‘rules’ that do not have underlying values | The board: Engages community to inform, not listen Has goals, but doesn’t tie them together Approves strategic plan, but does not use it in board work Considers the CEO responsible for vision Focuses on annual board goals to the detriment of stable, long-term goals Doesn’t always communicate values in policy language | The board: Seeks contact with community to learn from it Main interaction with the community is listening Writes a strategic plan with non-negotiable goals for achievement and instruction Refers to strategic plan in board decisions Puts priority on student learning over other goals Ensures its own goals and the supt’s goals align Reflects community values in its policy language | The board, in addition to proficient indicators: +Nurtures an ongoing community connection to learn its values and vision for results +Ensures long-range goals for organizational success remain the district’s #1 priority +Repeatedly reinforces vision of organizational success +Can explain organizational improvement initiatives and its own role in their execution +Aligns organizational and individual goals with those of the strategic plan +Incorporates values in policy/other board work |
3. The board gives operational guidance. | The board: Micro-manages staff work Ignores policy when making decisions Directs activity without saying why Has no distinction between board/staff Doesn’t respect the chain of command Focuses on activity rather than results Operates without principles or rules in running its meetings Allows its members to spring frequent surprises on staff and other members | The board: Sets policies to direct staff work, but pays little attention to those policies Gives inconsistent guidance to CEO/staff Focuses on directing staff work Ignores guiding its own board work Is primarily a ‘figure-head’ board Submits to ‘care and feeding’ by a board-savvy CEO Directs, but fails to lead Avoids surprising staff or one another | The board: Adopts policy to guide the district and the board Consults policy when making decisions Aligns resource management with board-approved goals Ensures staff know what the board expects for staff work Sees to it that collegial cooperation is well managed by the chair, who ensures the board follows its own guidance | The board, in addition to proficient indicators: +Sets clear expectations for staff work, board work, and individual board members as well +Keeps focus of the organizational vision on achievement vs. administration of the district +Spends most meeting time on organizational results and policy vs. making management decisions +Supports the chair’s role in guiding and maintaining its documented governing process +Empowers the CEO and staff to get results while working within parameters set by the board |
4. The board accounts for performance. | The board: Rarely checks to see if staff are complying with policy, nor if results are achieved Does not hold CEO accountable Fails to consider data in decision-making Never reviews its own performance, nor that of its members Uses blame and shame rather than formative feedback Fails to set criteria for success, nor to collect data for use in judging success | The board: Checks to see if staff are following policy Holds staff but not the CEO accountable Lets CEO control info flow to the board Lets staff decide what organizational results data mean Sometimes reviews its own performance Describes an intent to account for organizational success, but doesn’t take steps to measure results | The board: Reviews results of board goals at least annually Monitors staff for compliance with expectations Evaluates supt against clear criteria Is not afraid of negative data Reviews its own performance and that of its individual members Compares data vs. criteria to evaluate the district’s and the board’s performance Responds to data by declaring signs of progress | The board, in addition to proficient indicators: +Regularly reviews board work on a routine schedule in board meetings +Holds CEO accountable for organizational results, with priority on mission-critical organizational results +Uses data (both + and -) as a diagnostic tool +Uses principle-guided parameters +Evaluates CEO, itself, and its board members with an eye toward growth in their capacity +Responds to data, noting progress and adjusting criteria for the next cycle of monitoring |