Ineffective | Basic | Proficient | Distinguished | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. The board commits to a servant-leader and growth mindset. | The board: acts as if it has no higher authority; service to others (public/staff/students) is not valued; ‘gives away’ board authority; doesn’t believe all people can learn at high levels; doesn’t believe in staff’s (or the board’s) capacity to grow. | The board: is generally committed to service and board leadership; has no specific idea of how to take a servant-leadership role; follows staff lead; rarely asserts authority independently; is not aware of staff efforts to impact organizational results. | The board: adopts the value of service to others; serves the community as loyal subordinate; takes responsibility to lead the organization team via policy; adopts a growth mindset; believes all people can learn and grow based on individual effort; also believes in staff and board potential; acts on those beliefs. | The board: adopts mindset of servant-leadership; commits to serve state, community, customers & staff; takes responsibility for top team; governs via strategic board-level role; promotes belief that all people can learn through effort; pursues growth of staff/board to positively impact organizational results. |
2. The board has a strategic and systematic approach to governance. | The board: shows no concern for its impact on the organization; fails to view the organization as a system; has no clear plan (policymaking, board meetings, accountability) for how it approaches board work; undermines staff by ‘dabbling’; has no routines. | The board: has routines, not tied to a plan for board work; goes through the motions; allows CEO to guide policymaking, meetings, even accountability; aligns board role with that of staff; voices interest in deliberating before deciding, but takes shortcuts. | The board: considers decisions’ effects on the system; defines board work; has a clear approach to its work, thru processes and routines of governance/ policymaking, meetings, budgeting, accountability; has a strategic view of the board’s job; demands staff alignment with the board’s governance role. | The board: nurtures systems thinking, with professional development; has clear and comprehensive system of governance practices; with the CEO aligns resources with the board’s strategic goals, board processes and routines; leads the organization by doing the work it has designated as ‘board work’. |
3. The board connects with the community to learn its values | The board: neglects its duty between elections to connect with the community; reacts in ad hoc manner to complaints, inquiries; responds selectively to input; makes decisions without regard to community values or attitudes. | The board: sometimes schedules community events; informs community via public relations effort; mostly ‘tells’; lets CEO lead in community engagement; usually listens to the community; sets policy with minimal or no community input. | The board: connects with community; seeks community input and guidance; sets aside time in meetings to inform and to listen; engages with the community to build public confidence and learn community values and priorities; ensures that policy and other board decisions reflect community input and values. | The board: takes the lead in connecting to its community; continuously improves that connection; ongoing relationships in community keep the link fresh; listening is the main board interaction with the community; listens to learn values; acts on community values, embedding them in policy; enforces policy values. |
4. The board is steward of a vision for student learning | The board: has no shared goals for the organization; has no sense of overarching purpose; sets own goals; reacts to CEO goals; offers no proactive directional guidance; its work shows no evidence that goals exist; short-term thinking is the norm. | The board: relies on a ‘visionary’ CEO to set vision; responds to CEO goals; occasionally refers to long-term vision, which is developed by the CEO; board goals vary from year to year, and do not focus on long-term organizational goals. | The board: makes strategic planning the board’s job; goals reflect long-term vision; ensures board goals are equivalent to organization goals; teams up with CEO to set long-term and stable goals; aligns goals with organizational vision and values; sets priority on desired organiational results; supports supt goals for instruction. | The board: stable, long-term goals for organizational results; board goals are equal to district goals, and equal to CEO goals; staff align strategies with board-guided community vision and values; aligns organizational and individual goals; strategies are stable over time. |
5. The board guides its own members | The board: sets no expectations for individual board members; has no written protocol for board member behavior; depends on members to control selves, but has no written guidance; members often try to take a role they do not have; ethical lapses get in the way. | The board: has a general protocol, but seldom refers to or enforces it; depends on good will among members to maintain order; occasional lapses cause disruption; tries to respond to disruptions as needed; tolerates conflicting agendas. | The board: has clearly written protocol; individual members are encouraged to attend professional development to learn boardsmanship; publishes board member expectations; disruption of the board is infrequent and readily handled by the board chair; individual agendas are not supported. | The board: sets comprehensive policy for boardsmanship regularly refers to its policy; continuously reviews/refines board protocol; learns/enforces board basics; regularly pursues professional development; regularly reviews member performance, correcting as needed; helps members contribute. |
6. The board guides itself | The board: is divided about its appropriate role; holds dysfunctional meetings and creates confusion about what the board is for; prioritizes effort and attention on staff business, while its own governance role is ignored, confused, or abandoned. | The board: draws a general distinction between role of the board, setting policy, and that of CEO, implementing policy; in practice the roles often overlap; sets policy on board process; seldom refers to it; occasional dysfunctions occur. | The board: respects the board role and the role/ authority of its chair in carrying out governance responsibilities; writes policy guiding board work; enforces policy on board work; refers governance inquiries and complaints to the chair; prevents individual members from obstructing board chair. | The board: helps the chair fulfill his/her role by reminding its members of commitment to governing; writes and enforces policy guiding board work by reminding members of the contents of policy; defers to the chair for appropriate execution of the chair’s role, while retaining individual prerogatives. |
7. The board guides management | The board: directs staff throughout the organization; is reluctant to delegate decisions to the CEO; is means-oriented, wanting to ‘help’ the CEO's management, or blocking the CEO's planning with required “Mother may I?” permission requests. | The board: works cooperatively with a generally ‘board-savvy’ CEO; recognizes and tries to overcome or reduce its tendency to micromanage, yet it still reviews and approves most staff plans/priorities before the staff can act. | The board: defines CEO role; hires CEO; teams with CEO to clarify roles; delegates decisions, yet retains review and approval authority over issues it deems important; guides staff work, setting clear policy to direct the staff; aligns resources with organizational goals. | The board: leads the board-CEO team through policy, values-based guidance in lieu of directing the work of staff; prescribes desired organizational results, and empowers CEO and staff to execute; evaluates results; assures resources and staff efforts align with goals and values. |
8. The board accounts for the district | The board: focuses on directing work without having decided what is to be achieved; organizational results get only minimal attention; plays after the fact ‘blame game’; CEO evaluation is separated from oversight of district performance. | The board: adopts a strategic plan led by the CEO; gets updates on progress without deciding before-hand what board expectations those updates should address; is oriented to problem-solving (fixes problems as they surface). | The board: sets benchmarks to compare with other districts; ties expected outcomes to criteria defining success; demands data re: criteria for success; regularly monitors progress and adjusts guidance in response; gets data and interprets it; is forward looking while reviewing the past. | The board: sets benchmarks based on best practices and measures over time; focuses on organizational results over other priorities; monitors principle-guided, adherence to board-set parameters for programs and staff activity; studies data and plans for improvement with an eye to the future. |
9. The board accounts for itself | The board: is not concerned with board effectiveness; does not review its own performance; fails to assess board–CEO team effectiveness; doesn’t call out individual members who disrupt board work; fails to respond to disruption of board business. | The board: performs limited self-assessment, if time permits, after completing the annual CEO evaluation; chair/board majority generally reviews board performance; sometimes limits impact of disruptive members; often fails to focus the board. | The board: sets benchmarks to compare with other boards; uses protocol for self-evaluation; demands data re: criteria for success; annually reviews own performance; owns its part in district success; responds to monitoring, judging data against criteria; is forward looking while reviewing the past. | The board: uses policy criteria to assess its own effectiveness; regularly self-assesses in meetings as well as periodic in-depth reviews tied in with CEO evaluation; continuously adjusts its own actions based on self-assessment; follows up with revision of its policies. |
10. Board helps its members account for themselves | The board lets members: not be concerned with their own effectiveness; randomly intercede in or interfere with staff work; disrupt board work; ignore individual board member responsibility for overall board effectiveness; ignore critiques or feedback. | The board: encourages members to: participate in annual board self-assessment; become effective board members; usually read board packets before meetings; cooperate, but lets them sometimes be disruptive; respond when reminded of protocol. | The board: helps members: set benchmarks to judge their work; support the chair in enforcing norms; remind colleagues when protocol is violated; demand data re: criteria for success; self-assess as part of board self-assessment; respond to monitoring by judging data against criteria; pursue growth. | The board develops members ability and willingness to: regularly review and strengthen board protocol; continuously pursue individual growth; contribute to development of colleagues, informing them of protocol and reminding them as necessary; contribute to board self-assessment and growth. |