Components Rubric

IneffectiveBasicProficientDistinguished
1. The board commits to a servant-leader and growth mindset. The board:
 acts as if it has no higher authority;
 service to others (public/staff/students) is not valued;
 ‘gives away’ board authority;
 doesn’t believe all people can learn at high levels;
 doesn’t believe in staff’s (or the board’s) capacity to grow.
The board:
 is generally committed to service and board leadership;
 has no specific idea of how to take a servant-leadership role;
 follows staff lead;
 rarely asserts authority independently;
 is not aware of staff efforts to impact organizational results.
The board:
 adopts the value of service to others;
 serves the community as loyal subordinate;
 takes responsibility to lead the organization team via policy;
 adopts a growth mindset;
 believes all people can learn and grow based on individual effort;
 also believes in staff and board potential; acts on those beliefs.
The board:
 adopts mindset of servant-leadership;
 commits to serve state, community, customers & staff;
 takes responsibility for top team;
 governs via strategic board-level role;
 promotes belief that all people can learn through effort;
 pursues growth of staff/board to positively impact organizational results.
2. The board has a strategic and systematic approach to governance.The board:
 shows no concern for its impact on the organization;
 fails to view the organization as a system;
 has no clear plan (policymaking, board meetings, accountability) for how it approaches board work;
 undermines staff by ‘dabbling’;
 has no routines.
The board:
 has routines, not tied to a plan for board work;
 goes through the motions;
 allows CEO to guide policymaking, meetings, even accountability;
 aligns board role with that of staff; voices interest in deliberating before deciding, but takes shortcuts.
The board:
 considers decisions’ effects on the system; defines board work;
 has a clear approach to its work, thru processes and routines of governance/ policymaking, meetings, budgeting, accountability;
 has a strategic view of the board’s job;
 demands staff alignment with the board’s governance role.
The board:
 nurtures systems thinking, with professional development; has clear and comprehensive system of governance practices;
 with the CEO aligns resources with the board’s strategic goals, board processes and routines;
 leads the organization by doing the work it has designated as ‘board work’.
3. The board connects with the community to learn its values The board:
 neglects its duty between elections to connect with the community;
 reacts in ad hoc manner to complaints, inquiries;
 responds selectively to input; makes decisions without regard to community values or attitudes.
The board:
 sometimes schedules community events;
 informs community via public relations effort;
 mostly ‘tells’;
 lets CEO lead in community engagement;
 usually listens to the community;
 sets policy with minimal or no community input.
The board:
 connects with community;
 seeks community input and guidance;
 sets aside time in meetings to inform and to listen;
 engages with the community to build public confidence and learn community values and priorities;
 ensures that policy and other board decisions reflect community input and values.
The board:
 takes the lead in connecting to its community;
 continuously improves that connection;
 ongoing relationships in community keep the link fresh;
 listening is the main board interaction with the community;
 listens to learn values;
 acts on community values, embedding them in policy;
 enforces policy values.
4. The board is steward of a vision for student learning The board:
 has no shared goals for the organization;
 has no sense of overarching purpose;
 sets own goals;
 reacts to CEO goals;
 offers no proactive directional guidance;
 its work shows no evidence that goals exist;
 short-term thinking is the norm.
The board:
 relies on a ‘visionary’ CEO to set vision;
 responds to CEO goals;
 occasionally refers to long-term vision, which is developed by the CEO;
 board goals vary from year to year, and do not focus on long-term organizational goals.
The board:
 makes strategic planning the board’s job;
 goals reflect long-term vision;
 ensures board goals are equivalent to organization goals;
 teams up with CEO to set long-term and stable goals;
 aligns goals with organizational vision and values;
 sets priority on desired organiational results;
 supports supt goals for instruction.
The board:
 stable, long-term goals for organizational results;
 board goals are equal to district goals, and equal to CEO goals;
 staff align strategies with board-guided community vision and values;
 aligns organizational and individual goals;
 strategies are stable over time.
5. The board guides its own members The board:
 sets no expectations for individual board members;
 has no written protocol for board member behavior;
 depends on members to control selves, but has no written guidance;
 members often try to take a role they do not have;
 ethical lapses get in the way.
The board:
 has a general protocol, but seldom refers to or enforces it;
 depends on good will among members to maintain order;
 occasional lapses cause disruption;
 tries to respond to disruptions as needed;
 tolerates conflicting agendas.
The board:
 has clearly written protocol;
 individual members are encouraged to attend professional development to learn boardsmanship;
 publishes board member expectations;
 disruption of the board is infrequent and readily handled by the board chair;
 individual agendas are not supported.
The board:
 sets comprehensive policy for boardsmanship
 regularly refers to its policy;
 continuously reviews/refines board protocol;
 learns/enforces board basics;
 regularly pursues professional development;
 regularly reviews member performance, correcting as needed;
 helps members contribute.
6. The board guides itself The board:
 is divided about its appropriate role;
 holds dysfunctional meetings and creates confusion about what the board is for;
 prioritizes effort and attention on staff business, while its own governance role is ignored, confused, or abandoned.
The board:
 draws a general distinction between role of the board, setting policy, and that of CEO, implementing policy;
 in practice the roles often overlap;
 sets policy on board process;
 seldom refers to it;
 occasional dysfunctions occur.
The board:
 respects the board role and the role/ authority of its chair in carrying out governance responsibilities;
 writes policy guiding board work;
 enforces policy on board work;
 refers governance inquiries and complaints to the chair;
 prevents individual members from obstructing board chair.
The board:
 helps the chair fulfill his/her role by reminding its members of commitment to governing;
 writes and enforces policy guiding board work by reminding members of the contents of policy;
 defers to the chair for appropriate execution of the chair’s role, while retaining individual prerogatives.
7. The board guides managementThe board:
 directs staff throughout the organization;
is reluctant to delegate decisions to the CEO;
 is means-oriented, wanting to ‘help’ the CEO's management, or blocking the CEO's planning with required “Mother may I?” permission requests.
The board:
 works cooperatively with a generally ‘board-savvy’ CEO;
 recognizes and tries to overcome or reduce its tendency to micromanage, yet it still reviews and approves most staff plans/priorities before the staff can act.
The board:
 defines CEO role;
 hires CEO;
 teams with CEO to clarify roles;
 delegates decisions, yet retains review and approval authority over issues it deems important;
 guides staff work, setting clear policy to direct the staff;
 aligns resources with organizational goals.
The board:
 leads the board-CEO team through policy, values-based guidance in lieu of directing the work of staff;
 prescribes desired organizational results, and empowers CEO and staff to execute;
 evaluates results;
 assures resources and staff efforts align with goals and values.
8. The board accounts for the district The board:
 focuses on directing work without having decided what is to be achieved;
 organizational results get only minimal attention;
 plays after the fact ‘blame game’;
 CEO evaluation is separated from oversight of district performance.
The board:
 adopts a strategic plan led by the CEO; gets updates on progress without deciding before-hand what board expectations those updates should address;
 is oriented to problem-solving (fixes problems as they surface).
The board:
 sets benchmarks to compare with other districts; ties expected outcomes to criteria defining success;
 demands data re: criteria for success;
 regularly monitors progress and adjusts guidance in response;
 gets data and interprets it;
 is forward looking while reviewing the past.
The board:
 sets benchmarks based on best practices and measures over time;
 focuses on organizational results over other priorities;
 monitors principle-guided, adherence to board-set parameters for programs and staff activity;
 studies data and plans for improvement with an eye to the future.
9. The board accounts for itself The board:
 is not concerned with board effectiveness;
 does not review its own performance;
 fails to assess board–CEO team effectiveness;
 doesn’t call out individual members who disrupt board work;
 fails to respond to disruption of board business.
The board:
 performs limited self-assessment, if time permits, after completing the annual CEO evaluation;
 chair/board majority generally reviews board performance;
 sometimes limits impact of disruptive members;
 often fails to focus the board.
The board:
 sets benchmarks to compare with other boards;
 uses protocol for self-evaluation; demands data re: criteria for success;
 annually reviews own performance;
 owns its part in district success;
 responds to monitoring, judging data against criteria;
 is forward looking while reviewing the past.
The board:
 uses policy criteria to assess its own effectiveness;
 regularly self-assesses in meetings as well as periodic in-depth reviews tied in with CEO evaluation;
 continuously adjusts its own actions based on self-assessment; follows up with revision of its policies.
10. Board helps its members account for themselves The board lets members:
 not be concerned with their own effectiveness;
 randomly intercede in or interfere with staff work;
 disrupt board work;
 ignore individual board member responsibility for overall board effectiveness;
 ignore critiques or feedback.
The board: encourages members to:
 participate in annual board self-assessment;
 become effective board members;
 usually read board packets before meetings;
 cooperate, but lets them sometimes be disruptive;
 respond when reminded of protocol.
The board: helps members:
 set benchmarks to judge their work;
 support the chair in enforcing norms;
 remind colleagues when protocol is violated;
 demand data re: criteria for success; self-assess as part of board self-assessment;
 respond to monitoring by judging data against criteria;
 pursue growth.
The board develops members ability and willingness to:
 regularly review and strengthen board protocol;
 continuously pursue individual growth;
 contribute to development of colleagues, informing them of protocol and reminding them as necessary;
 contribute to board self-assessment and growth.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *